Search for: "Bond v. Merck " Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 12:30 pm by Barry Barnett
As we predicted, see Merck Lawyer Takes Nicks on Question of Timely Securities Complaint in Supreme Court, the Supreme Court in 2010 agreed with us in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:26 pm by Brad Pauley
  On its own motion, the Court stayed further briefing in this matter pending action by the United States Supreme Court in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:59 am by N. Peter Rasmussen
In securities fraud cases, held the Court, facts showing scienter are among those that constitute the violation (Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 12:46 am
" One recalls that the recent Supreme court case involving Merck and Integra (drug companies) could just as well have been captioned Scripps v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 5:28 pm
Evidently, Maclachlan hasn't heard about 35 USC 271(e)(1) or Merck v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:22 pm
Companies will still need a license when they want to bring the research into their company laboratories or when they want to develop a product for the market.Given that stem cell research is within the area covered by the exemption of 35 USC 271(e)(1) as interpreted by Merck v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Bombardier Rec (PATracer) Magotteaux - ITC issues an opinion on remedy, the public interest, and bonding in certain composite wear components (337-TA-644) (ITC Law Blog) Minemyer - N D Illinois delays trial for one year to allow incarcerated plaintiff to attend: Minemyer v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Parke-Davis, 733 P.2d 507, 515-16 (Wash. 1987); Bond v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
One notable exception is the statute of limitations, an issue where the Supreme Court provided a favorable ruling this year in Merck.* Of course, that ruling was influenced by the heightened requirements for pleading scienter in a securities fraud action that make it virtually impossible for an investor to assert a claim of fraud until there is clear evidence of fraudulent intent. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
The irony is that the new rigid rule, in the name of tightening, actually loosens the bonds obliging honesty. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
- Generic manufacturers aggressively promote expensive doxofylline over price controlled equivalent theophylline: (Spicy IP), Middle East – Ranbaxy strengthens presence in Middle East region: (GenericsWeb), Scotland: Future funding of stem cell companies in Scotland dependent on EPO Enlarged Board of Appeals’ decision on stem cell patentability: (IP finance), South Africa: More on AIDS/access debate - Patrick Bond article on Thabo Mbeki’s AIDS policy: (Afro-I [read post]
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
The Vioxx VerdictsThe legal community is still abuzz about the $253 million verdict against Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]